San Francisco, CA vs South San Francisco, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
South San Francisco has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | San Francisco | South San Francisco | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 265 | 232 | South San Francisco |
| Housing | 396 ($1,693) | 333 ($1,983) | South San Francisco |
| Transportation | 104 ($3.50) | 98 ($3.50) | South San Francisco |
| Food & groceries | 189 ($775) | 182 ($746) | South San Francisco |
| Utilities | 248 ($713) | 217 ($599) | South San Francisco |
| Healthcare | 248 ($515) | 217 ($433) | South San Francisco |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is San Francisco, CA or South San Francisco, CA cheaper to live in?
South San Francisco, CA is cheaper overall by about 33 index points (San Francisco, CA: 265, South San Francisco, CA: 232; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in San Francisco, CA vs South San Francisco, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $92,750/year in San Francisco, CA and $81,200/year in South San Francisco, CA to cover basic living costs.