Napa, CA vs San Francisco, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Napa has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Napa | San Francisco | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 176 | 265 | Napa |
| Housing | 237 ($1,516) | 396 ($1,693) | Napa |
| Transportation | 104 ($3.50) | 104 ($3.50) | Tie |
| Food & groceries | 137 ($562) | 189 ($775) | Napa |
| Utilities | 169 ($427) | 248 ($713) | Napa |
| Healthcare | 169 ($308) | 248 ($515) | Napa |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Napa, CA or San Francisco, CA cheaper to live in?
Napa, CA is cheaper overall by about 89 index points (Napa, CA: 176, San Francisco, CA: 265; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Napa, CA vs San Francisco, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $61,600/year in Napa, CA and $92,750/year in San Francisco, CA to cover basic living costs.