Richland, WA vs Spokane, WA: Cost of Living Comparison
Spokane has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Richland | Spokane | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 113 | 96 | Spokane |
| Housing | 115 ($978) | 94 ($799) | Spokane |
| Transportation | 103 ($3.50) | 105 ($3.50) | Richland |
| Food & groceries | 124 ($508) | 88 ($361) | Spokane |
| Utilities | 108 ($207) | 97 ($169) | Spokane |
| Healthcare | 108 ($150) | 97 ($122) | Spokane |
| Median annual wage | 130 ($62,990) | 130 ($62,990) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Richland, WA or Spokane, WA cheaper to live in?
Spokane, WA is cheaper overall by about 17 index points (Richland, WA: 113, Spokane, WA: 96; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Richland, WA vs Spokane, WA?
A single adult needs roughly $39,550/year in Richland, WA and $33,600/year in Spokane, WA to cover basic living costs.