Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Victorville, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Victorville has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Rancho Cucamonga | Victorville | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 159 | 101 | Victorville |
| Housing | 199 ($1,600) | 98 ($1,098) | Victorville |
| Transportation | 104 ($3.50) | 116 ($3.50) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Food & groceries | 147 ($603) | 95 ($390) | Victorville |
| Utilities | 150 ($358) | 99 ($176) | Victorville |
| Healthcare | 150 ($259) | 99 ($127) | Victorville |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Rancho Cucamonga, CA or Victorville, CA cheaper to live in?
Victorville, CA is cheaper overall by about 58 index points (Rancho Cucamonga, CA: 159, Victorville, CA: 101; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Victorville, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $55,650/year in Rancho Cucamonga, CA and $35,350/year in Victorville, CA to cover basic living costs.