Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Riverside, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Riverside has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Rancho Cucamonga | Riverside | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 159 | 133 | Riverside |
| Housing | 199 ($1,600) | 156 ($1,268) | Riverside |
| Transportation | 104 ($3.50) | 105 ($3.50) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Food & groceries | 147 ($603) | 119 ($488) | Riverside |
| Utilities | 150 ($358) | 128 ($281) | Riverside |
| Healthcare | 150 ($259) | 128 ($203) | Riverside |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Rancho Cucamonga, CA or Riverside, CA cheaper to live in?
Riverside, CA is cheaper overall by about 26 index points (Rancho Cucamonga, CA: 159, Riverside, CA: 133; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Rancho Cucamonga, CA vs Riverside, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $55,650/year in Rancho Cucamonga, CA and $46,550/year in Riverside, CA to cover basic living costs.