Omaha, NE vs Sioux Falls, SD: Cost of Living Comparison
Omaha has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Omaha | Sioux Falls | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 83 | 88 | Omaha |
| Housing | 66 ($805) | 78 ($695) | Omaha |
| Transportation | 101 ($3.50) | 97 ($3.50) | Sioux Falls |
| Food & groceries | 97 ($398) | 100 ($410) | Omaha |
| Utilities | 83 ($119) | 89 ($140) | Omaha |
| Healthcare | 83 ($86) | 89 ($101) | Omaha |
| Median annual wage | 101 ($48,980) | 97 ($47,080) | Sioux Falls |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Omaha, NE or Sioux Falls, SD cheaper to live in?
Omaha, NE is cheaper overall by about 5 index points (Omaha, NE: 83, Sioux Falls, SD: 88; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Omaha, NE vs Sioux Falls, SD?
A single adult needs roughly $29,050/year in Omaha, NE and $30,800/year in Sioux Falls, SD to cover basic living costs.