Oakland, CA vs South San Francisco, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Oakland has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Oakland | South San Francisco | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 190 | 232 | Oakland |
| Housing | 266 ($1,342) | 333 ($1,983) | Oakland |
| Transportation | 105 ($3.50) | 98 ($3.50) | South San Francisco |
| Food & groceries | 130 ($533) | 182 ($746) | Oakland |
| Utilities | 183 ($479) | 217 ($599) | Oakland |
| Healthcare | 183 ($346) | 217 ($433) | Oakland |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Oakland, CA or South San Francisco, CA cheaper to live in?
Oakland, CA is cheaper overall by about 42 index points (Oakland, CA: 190, South San Francisco, CA: 232; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Oakland, CA vs South San Francisco, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $66,500/year in Oakland, CA and $81,200/year in South San Francisco, CA to cover basic living costs.