Nampa, ID vs Spokane, WA: Cost of Living Comparison
Spokane has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Nampa | Spokane | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 97 | 96 | Spokane |
| Housing | 95 ($938) | 94 ($799) | Spokane |
| Transportation | 98 ($3.50) | 105 ($3.50) | Nampa |
| Food & groceries | 97 ($398) | 88 ($361) | Spokane |
| Utilities | 98 ($171) | 97 ($169) | Spokane |
| Healthcare | 98 ($124) | 97 ($122) | Spokane |
| Median annual wage | 99 ($47,970) | 130 ($62,990) | Nampa |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Nampa, ID or Spokane, WA cheaper to live in?
Spokane, WA is cheaper overall by about 1 index points (Nampa, ID: 97, Spokane, WA: 96; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Nampa, ID vs Spokane, WA?
A single adult needs roughly $33,950/year in Nampa, ID and $33,600/year in Spokane, WA to cover basic living costs.