Missoula, MT vs Spokane, WA: Cost of Living Comparison
Spokane has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Missoula | Spokane | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 110 | 96 | Spokane |
| Housing | 123 ($784) | 94 ($799) | Spokane |
| Transportation | 102 ($3.50) | 105 ($3.50) | Missoula |
| Food & groceries | 87 ($357) | 88 ($361) | Missoula |
| Utilities | 112 ($221) | 97 ($169) | Spokane |
| Healthcare | 112 ($160) | 97 ($122) | Spokane |
| Median annual wage | 100 ($48,740) | 130 ($62,990) | Missoula |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Missoula, MT or Spokane, WA cheaper to live in?
Spokane, WA is cheaper overall by about 14 index points (Missoula, MT: 110, Spokane, WA: 96; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Missoula, MT vs Spokane, WA?
A single adult needs roughly $38,500/year in Missoula, MT and $33,600/year in Spokane, WA to cover basic living costs.