Minneapolis, MN vs Rochester, MN: Cost of Living Comparison
Rochester has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Minneapolis | Rochester | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 102 | 95 | Rochester |
| Housing | 99 ($930) | 83 ($921) | Rochester |
| Transportation | 104 ($3.50) | 100 ($3.50) | Rochester |
| Food & groceries | 107 ($439) | 118 ($484) | Minneapolis |
| Utilities | 100 ($178) | 92 ($149) | Rochester |
| Healthcare | 100 ($129) | 92 ($108) | Rochester |
| Median annual wage | 117 ($56,920) | 117 ($56,920) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Minneapolis, MN or Rochester, MN cheaper to live in?
Rochester, MN is cheaper overall by about 7 index points (Minneapolis, MN: 102, Rochester, MN: 95; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Minneapolis, MN vs Rochester, MN?
A single adult needs roughly $35,700/year in Minneapolis, MN and $33,250/year in Rochester, MN to cover basic living costs.