Los Angeles, CA vs Porterville, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Porterville has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Los Angeles | Porterville | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 180 | 88 | Porterville |
| Housing | 253 ($1,315) | 79 ($778) | Porterville |
| Transportation | 109 ($3.50) | 111 ($3.50) | Los Angeles |
| Food & groceries | 108 ($443) | 79 ($324) | Porterville |
| Utilities | 177 ($455) | 90 ($142) | Porterville |
| Healthcare | 177 ($329) | 90 ($103) | Porterville |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Los Angeles, CA or Porterville, CA cheaper to live in?
Porterville, CA is cheaper overall by about 92 index points (Los Angeles, CA: 180, Porterville, CA: 88; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Los Angeles, CA vs Porterville, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $63,000/year in Los Angeles, CA and $30,800/year in Porterville, CA to cover basic living costs.