Los Angeles, CA vs Pasadena, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Los Angeles has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Los Angeles | Pasadena | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 180 | 208 | Los Angeles |
| Housing | 253 ($1,315) | 300 ($1,553) | Los Angeles |
| Transportation | 109 ($3.50) | 103 ($3.50) | Pasadena |
| Food & groceries | 108 ($443) | 139 ($570) | Los Angeles |
| Utilities | 177 ($455) | 200 ($540) | Los Angeles |
| Healthcare | 177 ($329) | 200 ($390) | Los Angeles |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Los Angeles, CA or Pasadena, CA cheaper to live in?
Los Angeles, CA is cheaper overall by about 28 index points (Los Angeles, CA: 180, Pasadena, CA: 208; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Los Angeles, CA vs Pasadena, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $63,000/year in Los Angeles, CA and $72,800/year in Pasadena, CA to cover basic living costs.