Lincoln, CA vs Stockton, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Stockton has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Lincoln | Stockton | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 149 | 112 | Stockton |
| Housing | 180 ($1,457) | 119 ($1,047) | Stockton |
| Transportation | 101 ($3.50) | 109 ($3.50) | Lincoln |
| Food & groceries | 145 ($595) | 103 ($422) | Stockton |
| Utilities | 140 ($324) | 110 ($214) | Stockton |
| Healthcare | 140 ($234) | 110 ($155) | Stockton |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lincoln, CA or Stockton, CA cheaper to live in?
Stockton, CA is cheaper overall by about 37 index points (Lincoln, CA: 149, Stockton, CA: 112; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Lincoln, CA vs Stockton, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $52,150/year in Lincoln, CA and $39,200/year in Stockton, CA to cover basic living costs.