Lancaster, CA vs Los Angeles, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Lancaster has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Lancaster | Los Angeles | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 110 | 180 | Lancaster |
| Housing | 117 ($1,187) | 253 ($1,315) | Lancaster |
| Transportation | 107 ($3.50) | 109 ($3.50) | Lancaster |
| Food & groceries | 102 ($418) | 108 ($443) | Lancaster |
| Utilities | 109 ($211) | 177 ($455) | Lancaster |
| Healthcare | 109 ($152) | 177 ($329) | Lancaster |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Lancaster, CA or Los Angeles, CA cheaper to live in?
Lancaster, CA is cheaper overall by about 70 index points (Lancaster, CA: 110, Los Angeles, CA: 180; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Lancaster, CA vs Los Angeles, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $38,500/year in Lancaster, CA and $63,000/year in Los Angeles, CA to cover basic living costs.