Kennewick, WA vs Richland, WA: Cost of Living Comparison
Kennewick has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Kennewick | Richland | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 100 | 113 | Kennewick |
| Housing | 99 ($839) | 115 ($978) | Kennewick |
| Transportation | 103 ($3.50) | 103 ($3.50) | Tie |
| Food & groceries | 98 ($402) | 124 ($508) | Kennewick |
| Utilities | 100 ($178) | 108 ($207) | Kennewick |
| Healthcare | 100 ($129) | 108 ($150) | Kennewick |
| Median annual wage | 130 ($62,990) | 130 ($62,990) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Kennewick, WA or Richland, WA cheaper to live in?
Kennewick, WA is cheaper overall by about 13 index points (Kennewick, WA: 100, Richland, WA: 113; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Kennewick, WA vs Richland, WA?
A single adult needs roughly $35,000/year in Kennewick, WA and $39,550/year in Richland, WA to cover basic living costs.