Irvine, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Rancho Cucamonga has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Irvine | Rancho Cucamonga | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 225 | 159 | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Housing | 320 ($2,025) | 199 ($1,600) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Transportation | 104 ($3.50) | 104 ($3.50) | Tie |
| Food & groceries | 174 ($713) | 147 ($603) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Utilities | 210 ($576) | 150 ($358) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Healthcare | 210 ($416) | 150 ($259) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Irvine, CA or Rancho Cucamonga, CA cheaper to live in?
Rancho Cucamonga, CA is cheaper overall by about 66 index points (Irvine, CA: 225, Rancho Cucamonga, CA: 159; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Irvine, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $78,750/year in Irvine, CA and $55,650/year in Rancho Cucamonga, CA to cover basic living costs.