Chicago, IL vs Waukegan, IL: Cost of Living Comparison
Waukegan has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Chicago | Waukegan | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 98 | 75 | Waukegan |
| Housing | 91 ($966) | 51 ($814) | Waukegan |
| Transportation | 109 ($3.50) | 103 ($3.50) | Waukegan |
| Food & groceries | 101 ($414) | 95 ($390) | Waukegan |
| Utilities | 96 ($164) | 76 ($92) | Waukegan |
| Healthcare | 96 ($118) | 76 ($66) | Waukegan |
| Median annual wage | 107 ($51,960) | 107 ($51,960) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chicago, IL or Waukegan, IL cheaper to live in?
Waukegan, IL is cheaper overall by about 23 index points (Chicago, IL: 98, Waukegan, IL: 75; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Chicago, IL vs Waukegan, IL?
A single adult needs roughly $34,300/year in Chicago, IL and $26,250/year in Waukegan, IL to cover basic living costs.