Chicago, IL vs Orland Park, IL: Cost of Living Comparison
Chicago has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Chicago | Orland Park | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 98 | 107 | Chicago |
| Housing | 91 ($966) | 100 ($991) | Chicago |
| Transportation | 109 ($3.50) | 102 ($3.50) | Orland Park |
| Food & groceries | 101 ($414) | 133 ($545) | Chicago |
| Utilities | 96 ($164) | 100 ($180) | Chicago |
| Healthcare | 96 ($118) | 100 ($130) | Chicago |
| Median annual wage | 107 ($51,960) | 107 ($51,960) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Chicago, IL or Orland Park, IL cheaper to live in?
Chicago, IL is cheaper overall by about 9 index points (Chicago, IL: 98, Orland Park, IL: 107; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Chicago, IL vs Orland Park, IL?
A single adult needs roughly $34,300/year in Chicago, IL and $37,450/year in Orland Park, IL to cover basic living costs.