Burbank, CA vs Los Angeles, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Los Angeles has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Burbank | Los Angeles | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 229 | 180 | Los Angeles |
| Housing | 320 ($1,722) | 253 ($1,315) | Los Angeles |
| Transportation | 96 ($3.50) | 109 ($3.50) | Burbank |
| Food & groceries | 204 ($836) | 108 ($443) | Los Angeles |
| Utilities | 210 ($576) | 177 ($455) | Los Angeles |
| Healthcare | 210 ($416) | 177 ($329) | Los Angeles |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Burbank, CA or Los Angeles, CA cheaper to live in?
Los Angeles, CA is cheaper overall by about 49 index points (Burbank, CA: 229, Los Angeles, CA: 180; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Burbank, CA vs Los Angeles, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $80,150/year in Burbank, CA and $63,000/year in Los Angeles, CA to cover basic living costs.