Bakersfield, CA vs Los Angeles, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Bakersfield has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Bakersfield | Los Angeles | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 102 | 180 | Bakersfield |
| Housing | 100 ($960) | 253 ($1,315) | Bakersfield |
| Transportation | 107 ($3.50) | 109 ($3.50) | Bakersfield |
| Food & groceries | 104 ($426) | 108 ($443) | Bakersfield |
| Utilities | 100 ($180) | 177 ($455) | Bakersfield |
| Healthcare | 100 ($130) | 177 ($329) | Bakersfield |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Bakersfield, CA or Los Angeles, CA cheaper to live in?
Bakersfield, CA is cheaper overall by about 78 index points (Bakersfield, CA: 102, Los Angeles, CA: 180; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Bakersfield, CA vs Los Angeles, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $35,700/year in Bakersfield, CA and $63,000/year in Los Angeles, CA to cover basic living costs.