Anaheim, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA: Cost of Living Comparison
Rancho Cucamonga has the lower overall cost of living. (100 = US national average)
Category-by-Category Comparison
| Category | Anaheim | Rancho Cucamonga | Cheaper |
|---|---|---|---|
| Overall cost of living | 166 | 159 | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Housing | 222 ($1,457) | 199 ($1,600) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Transportation | 104 ($3.50) | 104 ($3.50) | Tie |
| Food & groceries | 121 ($496) | 147 ($603) | Anaheim |
| Utilities | 161 ($400) | 150 ($358) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Healthcare | 161 ($289) | 150 ($259) | Rancho Cucamonga |
| Median annual wage | 120 ($58,240) | 120 ($58,240) | Tie |
Index 100 = US national average. Lower = cheaper. For wage, higher = better.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is Anaheim, CA or Rancho Cucamonga, CA cheaper to live in?
Rancho Cucamonga, CA is cheaper overall by about 7 index points (Anaheim, CA: 166, Rancho Cucamonga, CA: 159; 100 = US national average).
What salary do I need in Anaheim, CA vs Rancho Cucamonga, CA?
A single adult needs roughly $58,100/year in Anaheim, CA and $55,650/year in Rancho Cucamonga, CA to cover basic living costs.